The Sudanese Agreements you will read here below are obviously in English. If you want to read all of that in Arabic, please go to Sudanese Political Agreements. Thanks.
Some other things to know about this article, before you read anything is that it is the episode number 17 in a sequence of Sudanese political articles. So, this means that it has many other resources to look at, and maybe before reading this part of it here.
It's so long, so I divided it in many series, or episodes in this sequence, as you see from the following introduction. Part of it is at episode 16: Sudanese Agitation, with the Arabic version of it at Sudanese Political Agitation.
It flows into episode 17 and on this page. It also has an Arabic version at Sudanese Political Agreements and it continues in the first section of it at Sudanese Political Agreements and in episode 18, Sudanese Aids, with its Arabic version at Sudanese Political Aids.
The series in sequence 1 includes Sudanese political articles in English, Sudanese Arabic political articles, Sudanese commentaries and Sudanese comments, the loyal readers of the HOA Political Scene Newsletter and I have written on the HOA Political Scene Blog.
The readers of the Horn of Africa's Journal and the loyal visitors of HOA Political Scene have already built many categories on the Arabic HOA Political Scene at Readers Comment, Readers Read Good, Readers Write Comments and Readers Write Good.
They also add pages to this network at: Write about Chad, Write about Djibouti, Write about DRC, Write about Eritrea, Write about Ethiopia, Write about HOA, Write about Kenya, Write about Somalia, Write about Sudan and Write about Uganda.
The series of articles are in many episodes in the sequence of Sudanese articles and commentaries. This sequence alone has more than 200 episodes.
The work continues on the Sudanese sequence of political articles to complete the edition of it in an alphabetical and numerical order, as you see from the alphabet of the second term and the numbers.
This episode is connected with all of the episodes from episode 1 to the end. The episodes are at:
Episode 1: Sudanese Abilities| Episode 2: Sudanese Absence| Episode 3: Sudanese Abuse| Episode 4: Sudanese Achievements| Episode 5: Sudanese Actions| Episode 6: Sudanese Activities| Episode 7: Sudanese Administration| Episode 8: Sudanese Advantages| Episode 9: Sudanese Adversity| Episode 10: Sudanese Advices| Episode 11: Sudanese Advocacy| Episode 12: Sudanese Affairs| Episode 13: Sudanese Affiliation|
There are some Arabic versions of some of these episodes at:
Sudanese Political Abilities| Sudanese Political Absence| Sudanese Political Abuse| Sudanese Political Achievements| Sudanese Political Actions| Sudanese Political Activities| Sudanese Political Administration| Sudanese Political Advantages| Sudanese Political Adversity| Sudanese Political Advices| Sudanese Political Advocacy| Sudanese Political Affairs| Sudanese Political Affiliation| Sudanese Political Affliction|
The organization of the Sudanese political articles goes further to cover the following episodes:
Episode 15: Sudanese Aggression| Episode 16: Sudanese Agitation| Episode 17: Sudanese Agreements| Episode 18: Sudanese Aid| Episode 19: Sudanese Aims| Episode 20: Sudanese Alarm| Episode 21: Sudanese Alerts| Episode 22: Sudanese Allegations| Episode 23: Sudanese Allies| Episode 24: Sudanese Alternatives| Episode 25: Sudanese Ambitions| Episode 26: Sudanese Amnesty| Episode 27: Sudanese Analyses| Episode 28: Sudanese Anecdotes| Episode 29: Sudanese Anger| Episode 30: Sudanese Angles|
As well as Sudan, the organizational work continues to build other sequences with episodes for the other states in the Horn of Africa, including Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, Somaliland, South Sudan, and Uganda. Chad, or Tchad and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are supplementary.
This is a Horn Africas Network.
I take the term "agreement" in its plural form in the phrase, "Sudanese Agreements" by 4 definitions. The first and the second definitions are interior and the third and fourth definitions are exterior.
The first and the second interior definitions are concerning the following:
The Sudanese political agreements between right-wing political parties.
The Sudanese political agreements by governments and rebel movements.
The third and the fourth exterior definitions are concerning the following:
The Sudanese political agreements between the Sudanese political parties and foreign political groups.
The Sudanese political agreements between the Sudanese governments and other governments in the world.
So, expect this page to be very long and divided into many pages.
While taking the phrase "Sudan's Agreements" by these well-defined political terms, I intend to highlight and analyze such agreements and the negative impacts they have on the Sudanese people. I also, uncover the conspiracy theory against Sudan these agreements have in common.
The whole issue is not a matter of consensus in the vision between this and that of the parties to the political agreement, but in the common interests between the two parties, which belong to the periphery of the signatory intended only and not the people here and there.
The winds of conspiracies blow on Sudan and enter from this door to the people, and that's what you will discover in this Sudanese political analysis.
Yes, the Sudanese political analysis is from a purely Sudanese point of view, it is not biased towards any political party that has entered into such agreements, or has merely made it a matter to be signed, or agreed upon on papers or without papers, as is evident in the case of the first and second internal declarations. This political analysis is committed to the Sudanese people alone.
As, I stated in the previous page, (if you didn't read it, please go to episode 16) when I mentioned the social contract between the right-wing political parties, which are the Muslim Brothers Party and Umma Party, such types of political parties are not different.
The Muslim Brothers of Sudan have different names, since the independence of Sudan and I have already explained why is that and I'll continue to explain it further. So just let's call them, or their party, Muslim Brothers.
As the Brotherhood party understands the position of the sectarian parties and their strategies, so it helped them in the democratic era, three times, until it achieved the third party position by majority, in the Sudanese Parliament, and then revealed them to the masses after failing to manage the Sudan, and so as to strip them and then hit them in one strong stroke by military coups.
The Muslim Brotherhood has played this approach and used the policy of burning the political stages in Sudan to burn the Sudanese sectarian parties by such policy. It has succeeded, dramatically.
In fact the Muslim Brothers have used their own Muslim Brothers conspiracy theory to burn the political stages in Sudan. They worked first together with the Sectarian parties in the first and second decades, through another policy I called the political mentality absenteeism in Sudan. This is coming later.
They used the conspiracy theory with the sectarian parties, emotionally to get followers from the simple and down to the earth Sudanese people.
The people followed them, emotionally because they have used the religious teaching they have in their AWRAD. The religious characteristics they have shared between them, define such loyalty to the divine in their AWRAD, which leads the masses to believe and follow them, unconditionally.
The Sudanese Agreements so far between the two right-wing parties are clear through the use of religion to deceive the people by alleged divine that demands complete obedience to the leaders of these sects and consider disrespecting them and not hearing what they say is disobedience to God.
This human divinity has dominated the minds of simple people in Sudan for decades.
It is therefore exploitation of the minds of human beings and exploitation of the emotions of human beings. All this exploitation of human minds and emotions is one of the worst violations of human rights in Sudan.
Before the burning of the Sudanese sectarian parties through the policy of burning the political stages in Sudan for the continuation of the Muslim Brotherhood in power, the Muslim Brotherhood Party with the Sudanese sectarian parties have planned together a policy I called the political mentality absenteeism in Sudan.
Through this policy, the Sudanese sectarian parties, as well as the Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood, have long been washing the brains of the Sudanese people on the basis of sectarian allegiance and religious allegiance and exploiting them terribly.
That policy has been carried out to keep the Sudanese people politically ignorant of many issues and to blind them so as not to see, or know the details of the conspiracy theory that has been planned in Sudan, through the social contract between the sectarian parties and the Muslim Brothers.
The absenteeism policy has been successful for decades, evidences to that, most of our grandpas and fathers have been too loyal to the standard that they served those sectarian masters as servants and even donated to boxes of charities for them in the cemeteries of their dead in mosques and other places, believing that by doing so, they will get to paradise.
This aspect of human exploitation has been carried out through the policy of political mentality absenteeism, which is always used to serve the interests of the sectarian parties and the Chauvinistic religious party represented by the Muslim Brotherhood.
This means that religion has been exploited to serve the interests of the sectarian parties.
On the basis of the use of religion in the formation of religious and sectarian parties, and the use of religion in the policy of the state, the Sudanese people have been living woes and long-suffering, in the context of these Sudanese agreements between the sects and the muslim Brothers.
The absence of the Sudanese political mentality was in turn, successful in the political era in which these parties took power, and where the people did not have a comprehensive vision of the concept of the national Sudanese sovereignty. They still think that sovereignty means being independent from colonization.
The people didn't have this vision at the time to understand the concept of the state secularism, which means that religion should stay away of politics and not be used in the level of the state by Sharia laws, or any means.
The people also were not aware of the existence of permanent Sudanese agreements between the sectarian parties and the religious parties.
They thought that they all serve the objectives of the Islamic concept, which is alleged and biased to mislead the simple Sudanese to serve the interests of these religious and sectarian parties and serve their leaders and the first rows in leadership.
You can't see the results of something you planned today immediately today. So, the mentality absenteeism of the Sudanese has run through decades, so as to alienate the masses from mass participation in the Sudanese Communist Party, which has started with a totally different ideology, at the same period the Muslim Brothers started during the forties.
In a conservative Sudanese Muslim community, such policy is applicable and easy to implement, as the masses who believe in such religion are simple to the point that they believe anything you say to them in this instance.
So, the success of this policy, which was a periodical project was expected. As experimental, the Muslim Brothers used that policy at the first stage, targeting the masses to exploit them and then when exhausted by the Sudanese sectarian parties strike them by military coups.
The misery of the Sudanese people in the framework of such Sudanese aggression on politics, which is based on the Sudanese Agreements between religious and sectarian parties has led to three military coups, since the independence of Sudan.
This was the practical part of the conspiracy theory of the religious and sectarian parties against Sudan, which has been running since the independence from England in 1956. They planned it step by step and implemented it period by period in many decades.
Part of the conspiracy theory is aimed at bringing military coups, every time these parties fail in power to address the problems of Sudan, to take a breathe and then organize the opposition to return again to power and so forth.
The coups failed too, although they were led by adventurous army officers, who claimed that they came to solve the entire problems of Sudan, by implementing army-based revolutionary methods, to solve the problems in South Sudan and other regions and keep the state of Sudan united.
But, once they reached the political power through their coups, and saw that the political power provides them with strength and wealth, they deviated from the goals of their coups and betrayed the people. They are using the wealth of Sudan until this moment for their benefits, and for the security services that protect their interests in power and wealth.
The Sudanese sectarian parties and the Muslim Brothers Party have caused the military coups and produced the Sudanese dictatorship three times.
If no one can prove that there are somehow Sudanese political agreements signed between the military officers and the sectarian parties, but the events and the circle of democracy and military coups prove that.
The last one is a strong prove that the religious party of the Muslim Brothers has conducted the coup of Omar al-Bashir. Continue at Sudanese Political Agreements.
You absolutely have a say on Sudanese Political Agreements. So, why not write comments on SUDANESE POLITICAL AGREEMENTS?
You can watch SUDANESE POLITICAL AGREEMENTS on documentary film at TVCinemaApp.com.
Do you have a great story about this? Share it!
"Follow", "like", "tweet", or "pin" the pictures to express your love! ThanksTweet
You can work the French versions and the Spanish versions of the two books above with me on, one on one bases. Contact Us.
I'll be thankful, if you get one of my books.