3 Fundamental Injustice Stories about Fake Democracies and Human Rights!

"3 Fundamental Injustice Stories about Fake Democracies and Human Rights!" is not simply a collection of three cases or three well‑known figures. It is a warning signal. These stories reveal how the clock is ticking for a deep and undeniable backward shift happening inside Europe — a shift that exposes the fragility behind the polished image of democracy, neutrality, and human rights.

For decades, many people across Africa and the Middle East have imagined Europe as a kind of earthly paradise — a place of fairness, opportunity, and institutional integrity. But that image no longer holds. These cases show that the systems people admire from afar are now struggling under their own contradictions, revealing patterns of injustice that mirror the very failures they once condemned in others.

3 Fundamental Injustice Stories about Fake Democracies and Human Rights: Bascal Lottaz interviewing Swiss‑Cameroonian activist Nathalie Yamb on Her sanction and isolation, which exposes severe human rights violations in the capital of human rights organizations... striking deep at the heart of the UN and these organisations.

Sanctioned by the EU, Abandoned by Switzerland:

The Nathalie Yamb Case and the Architecture of Selective Citizenship!

When the European Union placed Swiss‑Cameroonian activist Nathalie Yamb on its sanctions list in 2025, the decision was framed as a matter of "security" and "foreign influence." But the deeper story — the one that exposes the political machinery beneath the surface — is not about Russia, nor about Africa, nor even about Yamb herself.

It is about how modern institutions police dissent, how they weaponize administrative tools to silence inconvenient voices, and how citizenship becomes conditional when a person's narrative challenges geopolitical interests.

The Yamb case is not an anomaly. It is a mirror.

And what it reflects is a pattern that stretches across continents — from underdeveloped countries I have watched for decades, to the heart of Europe, where the myth of institutional neutrality continues to crumble.

1. The Sanctions: Punishment Without Trial

In June 2025, the EU added Nathalie Yamb to a sanctions list originally designed to target Russia for its destabilizing activities. She became the first Swiss citizen to be sanctioned under this framework.

The accusations were not about criminal acts.
They were about speech:

• alleged alignment with Russian narratives
• participation in “informational manipulation campaigns”
• criticism of French military operations in Africa
• association with AFRIC, a research network accused of Russian ties

None of these allegations were tested in court.
None were subject to due process.
None were accompanied by transparent evidence.

This is the new frontier of political punishment:

• administrative sanctions used as a substitute for legal accountability.

2. The Legal Challenge: A Fight Against Arbitrary Power

Yamb responded by filing a case before the EU General Court (Case T‑582/25). Her legal arguments expose the structural flaws of the sanctions regime:

• No exemptions for Swiss nationals, despite Switzerland not being an EU member
• Violation of fundamental rights: movement, economic activity, expression
• Lack of due process: no hearing, no right to defend herself
• Insufficient factual basis: accusations too vague and broad
• Failure to state reasons: sanctions justified with contradictory or incomplete explanations

Her case is not only about her own rights.
It is about the dangerous precedent of punishing individuals for political speech under the banner of “security.”

3. The Narrative Battle: Africa, Europe, and the Fear of Dissent

Yamb’s primary political focus has always been Africa, not Ukraine. She has been a vocal critic of:

• French military interventions
• European influence networks
• Western narratives about African sovereignty

This is precisely why she became a target.

Her voice disrupts the geopolitical comfort zone.
Her rhetoric challenges the post‑colonial order.
Her influence in African political spaces threatens European strategic interests.

Labeling her "pro‑Russian" is not about Russia.
It is about delegitimizing anti‑colonial critique.

This is a pattern I have seen for years in underdeveloped countries:

• when a voice becomes too influential, institutions shift from debate to suppression.

4. Switzerland’s Silence: The First Abandonment

Switzerland — the country whose passport she holds — did not defend her.

Despite:

• the sanctions being extraterritorial
• the lack of due process
• the political nature of the accusations
• the impact on a Swiss citizen's rights

The Swiss government remained silent.

Neutrality, once a principle, has become a posture.
And in this case, even the posture collapsed.

5. The Second Abandonment: Swiss Banks Move Against Her

What happened next is even more revealing.

Although Switzerland did not officially adopt the EU sanctions, Swiss banks acted as if they had — in what Swiss media described as vorauseilender Gehorsam, "anticipatory obedience".

Swiss banks:

• closed all her accounts
• blocked her access to her own money
• classified her as a PEP (Politically Exposed Person) without justification
• refused incoming payments, making even basic transactions impossible
• reduced her to a "civil death", as one Swiss outlet described it

PostFinance, the state‑owned bank obligated to offer basic accounts, gave her an account so restricted it was practically unusable:

• no online banking
• no foreign currency
• no debit or credit card
• no digital payments
• no ability to receive payments from other banks

This is not neutrality.
This is not due process.
This is not the rule of law.

This is institutional abandonment.

And it mirrors the same patterns I have seen in countries with far weaker democratic reputations.

6. The Broader Pattern: When Citizenship Becomes Conditional

The Yamb case sits alongside others — Shamima Begum, dissidents across Africa, whistleblowers in Europe — as evidence of a global trend:

• When a person's narrative challenges power, institutions withdraw protection.
• When a citizen becomes politically inconvenient, citizenship becomes conditional.
• When institutions fear dissent, they use administrative tools to silence it.

This is the architecture of selective citizenship.

And it is the architecture I have been mapping in MY own Archive of Truth in Exile.

7. Conclusion: Switzerland's Position Is Not Neutral — It Is Complicit

The most shocking part of this story is not the EU sanctions.
It is Switzerland's reaction.

A country that prides itself on neutrality, due process, and human rights:

• did not defend its citizen
• did not question the EU's extraterritorial reach
• did not uphold its own legal standards
• and allowed its banks to enforce sanctions that Switzerland never adopted

Worse still:

• Swiss banks closed her accounts and refused to return her money.

This is not neutrality.
This is not independence.
This is not the Switzerland the world imagines.

This is a quiet alignment with power — and a quiet abandonment of a citizen.

The Yamb case is not an exception.
It is a warning.

Sources:
EU legal filing: Case T‑582/25, Yamb v Council https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=T-582/25

Weltwoche report on Swiss banks enforcing sanctions and closing her accounts https://weltwoche.ch/story/nathalie-yamb-sanktionen-schweiz-banken

Ministers Cannot Ignore the Shamima Begum Case:

What Her Story Reveals About Citizenship, Power, and the Politics of Abandonment

When a headline declares that "Ministers cannot go on ignoring the Shamima Begum case," it is not simply a call for political attention. It is an indictment of a system that has used administrative power to erase a citizen rather than confront its own failures.

The Shamima Begum case is not about one young woman who left the UK at 15.
It is about how a state chooses to define citizenship, how it constructs narratives of threat, and how it abandons individuals when their existence becomes politically inconvenient.

This case sits squarely within the global pattern I have observed for decades — from underdeveloped countries to the heart of Europe — where institutions retreat from responsibility by weaponizing silence, narrative, and administrative tools.

1. A Child Leaves the UK — and the State Looks Away

In 2015, three schoolgirls from East London — all minors — left the UK to join ISIS in Syria. Shamima Begum was 15 years old.

The UK's security services had been monitoring the radicalisation pipeline in her community.
They had intelligence on the recruiter who groomed her.
They had warnings from her school.

Yet the state failed to intervene.

This is the first act of institutional avoidance:
the failure to protect a child from trafficking and exploitation.

2. The Citizenship Revocation: Administrative Power as Erasure

In 2019, the UK Home Secretary stripped Begum of her British citizenship, claiming she posed a security threat.

This decision:

• was made without trial
• relied on secret evidence
• was justified through political rhetoric
• effectively rendered her stateless
• shifted responsibility onto Bangladesh, a country she had never lived in

The UK used an administrative tool — citizenship deprivation — to erase its own role in her radicalisation and trafficking.

This is the second act of avoidance:

• the state punishes the victim to avoid confronting its own failures.

3. The Trafficking Question: The Issue the UK Wants to Avoid

The European Court of Human Rights is now examining whether the UK violated its anti‑trafficking obligations by failing to protect Begum as a minor.

The central question is not whether she joined ISIS.
It is whether she was trafficked.

If she was trafficked:

• the UK had a duty to protect her
• the UK had a duty to investigate
• the UK had a duty to support her recovery
• the UK had no legal basis to strip her citizenship

This is why ministers want to avoid the case:

• acknowledging trafficking would expose institutional negligence.

4. The Narrative War: Constructing the "Perfect Enemy"

The UK government framed Begum as:

• a threat
• a traitor
• a symbol
• a political liability

This narrative served several purposes:

• it shifted public anger away from government failures
• it created a simple villain for a complex story
• it allowed ministers to appear “tough on security”
• it silenced uncomfortable questions about grooming and trafficking

This is the third act of avoidance:

• the state constructs a narrative to justify abandonment.

5. The Legal Afterlife: When Citizenship Becomes Conditional

The UK Supreme Court upheld the government's decision, arguing that national security concerns outweighed Begum's right to return and participate in her own appeal.

This ruling sets a dangerous precedent:

• citizenship becomes conditional
• due process becomes optional
• minors can be punished for their exploitation
• administrative power overrides legal rights

This is not just about Begum.
It is about the future of citizenship in the UK.

6. The Broader Pattern: From London to Geneva to the Global South

My reaction to this case is not emotional — it is analytical.

I have seen this pattern before:

• in underdeveloped countries where citizens are abandoned when politically inconvenient
• in MY own Geneva encounters, where institutions retreat into silence
• in the Nathalie Yamb case, where Switzerland abandoned a citizen under external pressure

The pattern is global:

• When a person's existence threatens the narrative, institutions withdraw protection.

Begum's case is not an exception.
It is part of a transnational architecture of selective citizenship.

7. Conclusion: Ministers Cannot Ignore This Case — Because It Exposes Them

The Shamima Begum case forces the UK to confront:

• its failure to protect a child
• its failure to investigate trafficking
• its use of citizenship as a political weapon
• its willingness to abandon a citizen for convenience
• its reliance on narrative over justice

This is why ministers avoid the case.
Not because it is legally complex.
But because it is politically revealing.

The Begum case is not about her alone.
It is about the state's responsibility, the limits of citizenship, and the dangerous power of administrative erasure.

And like the Yamb case, it shows that the myth of Western institutional superiority is just that — a myth.

Khalid Osman: A Case Study in Institutional Avoidance, Administrative Silence, and the Fragility of "Neutral" Systems

From an observer's standpoint, the case of Khalid Osman is not simply the story of one veteran activist and journalist and the voice behind the Archive of Truth in Exile navigating bureaucratic obstacles. It is a textbook example of how institutions behave when confronted with a citizen who refuses to accept erasure, who insists on clarity, and who documents every step of the process.

His archive reveals a pattern that is both familiar and deeply unsettling:

• institutions that present themselves as neutral, fair, and rights‑based can, under pressure or convenience, retreat into silence, delay, and procedural ambiguity.

His case exposes this architecture with unusual clarity.

1. The Initial Trigger: A Citizen Seeking Protection Meets a System Seeking Distance

His episodes describe a moment when he approached institutions — police, legal representatives, administrative bodies — expecting protection, clarity, or due process.

Instead, he encountered:

• evasive communication
• contradictory instructions
• unexplained delays
• shifting responsibilities
• refusal to acknowledge errors
• silence where accountability was required

This is the first layer of institutional avoidance:
the system creates distance instead of resolution.

2. The Lawyer's Silence: When Representation Becomes a Form of Abandonment

One of the most striking elements in his archive is the behavior of the lawyer who was supposed to represent him.

From an observer's perspective, the silence of a legal representative is not a small detail — it is a structural failure.

Khalid's testimony shows:

• police not responding to his complaints
• police lying & turning his complaints against him
• court sessions created to incriminate
• no due process
• no cross-examination
• unanswered emails, un viewed recorded evidences
• unreturned calls
• missing explanations
• failure to act on urgent matters
• refusal to clarify procedural steps

This is not simply poor service.

• It is a form of administrative abandonment, where the person tasked with defending his rights becomes a barrier instead of a bridge.

This mirrors the pattern seen in other cases:

• when a citizen becomes inconvenient, representation collapses.

3. The Police Encounters: The Ambiguity of Protection

His episodes describe multiple interactions with police — each one revealing a tension between:

• what the institution claims to be
• and how it behaves in practice

As an observer, the pattern is clear:

• inconsistent explanations
• unclear procedures
• shifting narratives
• reluctance to document events exactly as they were
• avoidance of responsibility

This is not unique to his case.
It is part of a broader phenomenon:

• institutions that rely on ambiguity to avoid accountability.

4. The Administrative Maze: When Process Becomes a Tool of Control

His archive shows how administrative systems can use:

• delays
• missing documents
• contradictory instructions
• unclear deadlines
• procedural opacity
• as tools of control.

This is not overt oppression.

• It is soft obstruction, the kind that leaves no fingerprints but leaves the citizen exhausted.

His case demonstrates how a system can appear neutral while behaving in ways that undermine the very rights it claims to uphold.

5. The Emotional Afterlife: When Institutions Create the Conditions They Later Ignore

One of the most powerful aspects of his archive is how it documents the emotional and psychological toll of institutional avoidance.

As an observer, what stands out is not the emotion itself — but the institutional indifference to it.

His episodes show:

• distress met with silence
• urgency met with delay
• clarity met with confusion
• vulnerability met with procedural coldness

This is the same pattern seen in other cases:
institutions create harm, then treat the resulting distress as irrelevant.

6. The Counter‑Archive: His Refusal to Disappear

What distinguishes his case from many others is his response.

Instead of accepting erasure, he built:

• a structured archive
• a chronological testimony
• a public record
• a philosophical framework
• a political analysis

This transforms his case from a private struggle into a public document of institutional behavior.

As an observer, this is the most significant part of his story: He refused the silence that institutions rely on.

7. The Broader Pattern: His Case as a Mirror of Systemic Fragility

Khalid's case sits alongside the Yamb and Begum cases not because the facts are identical, but because the institutional logic is the same:

• avoidance
• narrative control
• administrative erasure
• selective protection
• silence as strategy

His archive shows that these patterns are not limited to "weak" states or "underdeveloped" systems.

They appear everywhere, including in countries that present themselves as models of democracy, neutrality, and human rights.

His case exposes the fragility of these claims.

Conclusion: Why Khalid's Case Matters Beyond His Own Experience

From an observer's perspective, the significance of his case is not only in what happened to him — but in what his testimony reveals:

• how institutions behave under pressure
• how rights can be undermined through silence
• how administrative systems can fail without admitting failure
• how a citizen can be abandoned without anyone saying the word "abandonment"
• how the myth of institutional neutrality collapses under scrutiny

Khalid's Archive of Truth in Exile is not just a record of his experiences.

• It is a map of institutional behavior, a counter‑narrative to official silence, and a contribution to a global understanding of how injustice operates in systems that claim to be just.

And that is why his case belongs alongside the others — not as a personal grievance, but as a structural example.

3 Fundamental Injustice Stories about Fake Democracies and Human Rights:

Solidarity Call

Conventional Narratives Have Strong Impacts of Systemic Behaviours and Failures!

The Action Guide Solves Anything Else Beside the 3 Fundamental Injustice Stories about Fake Democracies and Human Rights

What Do You Think of 3 Fundamental Injustice Stories about Fake Democracies and Human Rights?

Let's know what duo you think of "3 Fundamental Injustice Stories about Fake Democracies and Human Righ".

Your interaction means a lot to us and I personally appreciate it very much. You cn use commentary form also to bring your story into this huge network. If you know of anyone who is experiencing the same issues, please make sure to have their consent and write it here. We are sincere about putting human rights organization in their right place of accountability. Your voice is our power... this network is yours too.

Did you get any of my books from Apple Books?

Click here to tell me & get some free books. Fill the form.

رواية "الموتُ شرقاً" تكشف لك سرّ الموت الشرقي التراجيدي المستمر للإنسان

احصل علي الرواية الآن واكتشف إنهيار القواسم المشتركة، واستلهم إبداعا يشبه الأسطورة في النص الروائي

رواية الموت شرقاً بقلم خالد محمد عثمان

"Follow", "like", "tweet", or "pin" the pictures to express your love! Thanks

Horn Africa's Political Tragedy

Horn of Africa's Political Tragedy, political analyses through history up to date, by journalist, poet and writer Khalid Mohammed Osman on Apple Books. Your support means a lot to the movement of the masses.

Love in the Internet Time on Apple Books

Love in the Internet Time by journalist, poet and writer Khalid Mohammed Osman on Apple Books. This is a lifetime inspiring love story in the internet time.

Rising of the Phoenix Poetry on Apple Books

Rising of the Phoenix, the second edition of the poetry by journalist, poet and writer Khalid Mohammed Osman on Apple Books. It includes inspiring love and political poetry and imagery and Surrealistic poetry.

Free Poetry Picture Book

Free poetry picture book on Apple Books. You can use the images on public places for your customers to enjoy, while taking coffee.

Rising of the Phoenix Picture Book, of course with verses. The poetry by journalist, poet and writer Khalid Mohammed Osman on Apple Books. It includes inspiring love and political poetry and imagery and Surrealistic poetry.

The French & Spanish Versions

You can work the French versions and the Spanish versions of the two books above with me on, one on one bases. Contact Us.

HOAs Political Poetry Imaged

I'll be thankful, if you get one of my books.

My Books!

hoa-politicalscene.com - Poet Khalid Mohammed Osman's poetry book, Rising of the Phoenix.

hoa-politicalscene.com - The second addition of Poet Khalid Mohammed Osman's poetry book, Rising of the Phoenix.

HOA Political Scene Poem from Consistency by poet and journalist Khalid Mohammed Osman.

HOA Political Scene poem from Consistency by journalist and poet Khalid Mohammed Osman on Pierre Auguste Renoir's Parisian Woman.

Love in the Internet Time الحب في زمن الإنترنت by Author Khalid Mohammed Osman

HOA Political Scene poem from The Sun, the Sea, the Wedding by poet and journalist Khalid Mohammed Osman on Pierre Auguste Renoir's Dancing Couple.

hoa-politicalscene.com - Sudanese writer Khalid Mohammed Osman's book, "Political Tragedy of the Horn of Africa".